Flexible like the future: Why our collective model makes agencies look old-fashioned
For many SMEs, a freelancer collective is a more suitable alternative to a traditional agency when flexibility, specialized knowledge, and direct communication are more important than hierarchy and overhead. This article shows when the collective model makes sense and what you should consider regarding responsibilities, Budget and pay attention to the handover.

For many SMEs is a Freelancer collective today, it's the more suitable alternative to the traditional agency if flexibility, specialized knowledge, and a direct line more important than hierarchy, lengthy decision-making processes, and rigid structures. This is precisely where the strength of [the system] lies. collective modelYou don't get a rigid package, but a team that adapts to your actual needs.

I'm not writing this from theory, but from over 20 years of practical experience with small businesses, family-run companies, and expert teams. Especially in South Tyrol and around Bolzano I often see the same situation: A company doesn't need a large agency apparatus, but neither does it need just a single freelancer. A company needs several specialists who work together in a coordinated, responsible, and economically sound manner.

A good collective model is not a loose network. A good collective model is a clearly structured collaboration with flexible personnel but fixed responsibilities.

The reality of the market is also important: For Germany, the WIK short studyThe study concludes that a shortage of skilled workers in computer science, IT security, and data analysis is a significant obstacle to the digitalization of SMEs. It also cites Bitkom data indicating that... 74 percent The surveyed companies reported a shortage of IT specialists and an average of [number] open IT positions in 2022. 7,1 months remained vacant. If expertise is so hard to find, flexible working models and reliable expert networks are simply relevant in practice for many businesses.

The collective model as a flexible agency alternative for SMEs

A Freelancer collective It's a deliberately built network of specialists who collaborate in the appropriate size depending on the task. Unlike a traditional agency, there's less hierarchy and less overhead. Unlike a single freelancer, there are multiple expert perspectives. And unlike an in-house team, you don't have to permanently add every skill to your own payroll.

Many companies are looking for a “agile agency”But they actually mean something else: a setup that starts quickly, thinks clearly, and doesn't involve more people than necessary. That's precisely where a collective model works well. The team remains lean, responsibilities remain clear, and you communicate directly with the people who are actually working on your project.

The basic logic is also supported internationally by research: The paper The New Geography of Labor Markets A study by WFH Research for the US shows that distributed work expands the recruitment radius and taps into deeper talent pools. At the same time, the proportion of paid workdays performed from home increased there. 7 percent in 2019 on 26 percent in 2025, especially in knowledge-intensive fields. For me, this confirms something I've long observed in practice: Good collaborative work today depends less on a shared office than on clear processes, responsibility, and trust.

Agency, freelancer collective, individual freelancer or in-house?

The right structure does not depend on trends, but on the task, pace, Budget and internal strength. For small businesses, the decision is often easier if you objectively compare the models.

Model Power boundaries Especially suitable for
Classic agency Broad range of services, well-established processes, often high capacity More overhead, multiple levels, often higher fixed costs Larger budgets, ongoing campaigns, complex corporate structures
Freelancer collective Direct line, targeted specialists, flexible staffing, streamlined management It only works with clear leadership and clean documentation. Website relaunch, rebranding, campaign launch, digitization, special requirements
Individual freelancers Fast, direct, often inexpensive to start Limited bandwidth, higher risk of failure, less scalability Clearly defined individual tasks
In-house team Close proximity to the company; internal knowledge remains in-house. High ongoing costs, recruitment effort, not every skill is needed permanently. Permanent marketing or digital roles with constant demand

In my experience, that's Collective model This is especially true when an SME needs several disciplines simultaneously, but doesn't have a full-time employee in each one. This happens more often than many realize: A business might need brand strategy, copywriting, design, web development, and perhaps SEO or automation all at once. A single person can rarely cover all of this at a high level. However, building a large agency is often unnecessary.

When a freelancer collective makes sense for your SME

This model is a good fit if…

  • you have a project with several subject areas, such as rebranding, a new website and accompanying marketing.
  • you want to start quickly, but you don't want to build up a long recruitment process.
  • you only need specialized knowledge in phases, for example SEO, photography, conversion texts or AI-supported process optimization.
  • you appreciate short distances and want to speak directly with those implementing the changes.
  • you want to avoid dependencies and you value access, ownership, and a clean handover.

This model is probably not suitable if…

  • you only have a clearly defined single task You have problems that an experienced solo freelancer can solve alone.
  • you have to manage a large internal team on a daily basis and for that you need a permanent management level within the company.
  • Above all, you want maximum internal availability looking for someone for ongoing operational tasks.

This is precisely the point I often advise entrepreneurs in South Tyrol on: Not every project needs scalable creative teamsBut as soon as several trades need to work together, a good team quickly becomes essential. This applies to... Branding & Design just like with Web design & development or in strategic digital projects.

This is how the collaboration works in practice.

Many SMEs initially have the same concern when considering a freelance collective: It sounds flexible, but won't it be chaotic? The valid answer is: Only if roles and responsibilities are unclear. That's why the structure is more important than the team size.

  • 1. Clarification before the start: First, we define the goal, the bottleneck, the scope, and the decision-making possibilities. Strategizing before implementation saves costly loopholes later.
  • 2. Suitable cast: Only the people who are absolutely necessary for the task are involved. No more, but also not too few.
  • 3. Clear leadership: Every project needs a responsible person. Flexibly staffed teams actually need more, not less, clarity in leadership.
  • 4. Direct communication: You're not talking about multiple intermediate levels. Direct communication shortens paths and prevents misunderstandings.
  • 5. Documentation and handover: Decisions, access, files and processes are managed in such a way that your company always maintains an overview.

In my work with Berger+Team in Bolzano, this is often the crucial difference: we don't create artificial distance. When a family business needs a website relaunch, strategy, text, design, and technology communicate with each other early on. When a craft business wants to increase its online visibility, a large agency process doesn't have to be initiated first. Often, a small, well-managed team with clear responsibilities and a logical sequence is sufficient.

If you are interested in the process side in more detail, you can find more information in my post about... clear processes within the freelancer collective Further practical guidelines. Because flexible collaboration is only strong if it becomes easier for the customer, not more complicated.

Responsibility, Budget and handover: Here's what you should pay attention to

For me, transparency isn't a selling point, but a fundamental requirement for fair collaboration. A collective model only works well in the long run if you, as the client, always know who decides what your project entails. Budget It carries and what ultimately truly belongs to you.

take on

Always ask the following question first: Who is leading the project? A freelance collective needs a clear primary responsibility for structure, quality, and priorities. Without this role, flexibility quickly turns into friction.

Budget

Don't just ask about daily rates, ask about logic. Which roles are needed when? Which services are core components, and which are only needed on demand? Especially for SMEs, this makes more economic sense than rigid packages or retainers that run in the background even when not every discipline is actively required.

Access and ownership

Domains, hosting, analytics tools, advertising accounts, design files, texts, and source code should be accessible to you or cleanly transferred to you. I'm not a fan of models that artificially bind customers. That contradicts my understanding of win-win-win. Good collaboration can certainly be long-term, but never forced through ambiguity.

handing over

A clean handover is not an add-on, but an integral part of the service. This includes documented decisions, clearly defined responsibilities, organized files, and understandable explanations for your team or any future partner. That's precisely why strategic handover is so important. Advisory So important at the beginning: It creates the basis for ensuring that implementation, maintenance and subsequent development do not take place in the fog.

What a good collective model should not promise

I don't believe in sweeping statements like "always faster" or "generally cheaper than any agency." Such phrases sound good, but they don't help you much in making a real decision. A systematic literature review in Project Management Journal While it highlights frequently reported advantages of agile project work, it also points to very heterogeneous study contexts. Therefore, I prefer to formulate such points clearly:

  • A collective can be faster, if the task is clear and the right team is in place early.
  • A collective can be more economical., if you only need specialized knowledge temporarily.
  • A collective is not automatically better., but better suited to specific project types.

From my experience working with SMEs, I can say that the biggest advantage rarely lies solely in the price. The greatest advantage usually lies in the combination of speed, clarity, and appropriate depth. You're not paying for someone's time, but for a meaningful framework that combines strategy and implementation.

Why this model can work particularly well for South Tyrolean SMEs

Many businesses in South Tyrol are down-to-earth, quality-conscious, and deeply involved in day-to-day operations. That's precisely why they often don't need a flashy public image, but rather sound decisions. An entrepreneur in Bolzano, Bressanone, or Merano usually doesn't want a show, but a sustainable solution: less chaos, better inquiries, clearer positioning, and efficient processes.

A Freelancer collective That fits, if it takes this stance seriously. Not as a loose group of individualists, but as a responsible form of collaborative cooperationFor Berger+Team, this is central: strategy over surface, substance over hype, relationship over dependency. That's why we don't work to ensure you need us for as long as possible. We work to make your brand, your website, and your processes sustainable.

Especially for owner-managed businesses and small teams, this is often the most sensible form of external support. Not too big, not too small, but just right. If you'd like to explore this further, my perspective on... is also worth considering. long-term collaboration instead of constant pitchesA good partnership arises not from attachment, but from trust and verifiable performance.

Questions? Answers!

When is a freelancer collective more sensible than a traditional agency?

A freelance collective is usually more suitable when your project requires multiple disciplines but not a large agency structure. For SMEs, this is often the case with rebranding, website relaunches, campaign launches, or digitalization, because speed and specialized knowledge are more important than hierarchy.

Do I have only one contact person within a collective, or many?

You should always have a clearly responsible main contact person, even if several specialists are involved. The benefit for you is clear external control while still maintaining a direct line to the experts where it makes sense.

Is a collective automatically cheaper than an agency?

No, not automatically. A collective is primarily economically strong when you only need certain skills temporarily and don't want to co-finance large overhead costs. For very large, long-term structures, a different model might be more suitable.

How can I prevent dependence on external service providers?

Ensure that access rights, accounts, files, and documentation are securely stored in your possession or transferred to you. Maintaining ownership and oversight allows you to continue collaboration, take over internal roles, or transition without starting from scratch.

Is this model also suitable for small businesses in South Tyrol?

Yes, often exceptionally well. Small businesses in South Tyrol frequently don't need a full-fledged department, but rather precisely targeted expertise in brand building, website design, marketing, or digital processes. A well-managed collective model is designed for exactly that purpose.

How do I get started without committing myself too much right away?

Start with a clear definition of your goal and a manageable first step, not with a full-scale program. A good team can begin small, set clear priorities, and only expand when the benefits are evident.

Conclusion

The Collective model For many SMEs, this isn't a last resort between an agency and a freelance individual, but rather an independent and often very sensible form of collaboration. If you need multiple skills but want to keep things lean, a Freelancer collective The better structure would be: with clear leadership, direct communication and appropriate staffing instead of unnecessary apparatus.

From my perspective as a strategy consultant from Bolzano, that's precisely the crux of the matter: A model must fit your company, not some passing trend. If your business needs clarity, accountability, and flexible implementation, a collective approach can be very powerful. If your project requires something different, that should be communicated just as openly. Good consulting doesn't begin with selling a model, but with an honest assessment.

Sources

  1. WIK Short Study: Digital Transformation in Times of Skilled Labor Shortage — wik.org (2023)
  2. WFH Research / Hoover Institution: The New Geography of Labor Markets — wfhresearch.com (2025)
  3. Project Management Journal: What is Agile Project Management? Developing a New Definition Following a Systematic Literature Review — journals.sagepub.com (2024)
Florian Berger
Bloggerei.de